nomonkeybusiness.org

a no-nonsense clearing in
the personal finance jungle

By whom

Stuart Fowler - professional investor and finance author

For whom

Anyone trying to sort sense from nonsense in a seriously conflicted financial services industry

Business connections

Wealth Management

Wealth management & planning for individuals

Workshops

Workshops for individuals and employee groups

Book

No Monkey Business: what Investors need to know and why

(FT Prentice Hall 2002)

email Stuart Fowler

Home » Archives » March 2005 » Restoring faith in savings industry: ABI has a plan For grown-up consumers

[Previous entry: "Updated index for: Equity returns"] [Next entry: "When others damage your credit For grown-up consumers"]

03/09/2005: "Restoring faith in savings industry: ABI has a plan For grown-up consumers"


I'm not at the ABI's London Conference today and the plan Chairman Richard Harvey talks about in the FT today isn't on the published agenda. 'The savings industry has work to do to win back the confidence of customers, consumer groups and politicians', he says in his article. Anything insurers do to improve consumer satisfaction, contribute to consumer education and boost the product of the nation's savings has to be welcomed. But insurance companies are manufacturers of financial products with service obligations that attach to the products and the contracts, not to people. In most cases they have no relationship with people because the economics of distribution have forced them to rely on third parties: brokers and financial advisers. They don't even have the systems to support personal service: they have a hard enough struggle trying to get their legacy systems to support cross selling, (what management consultants call 'customer relationship management').

Their efforts may be welcome but they are not a solution. Insurance company chiefs have only to ask themselves: if consumers were well-informed (or simply streetwise), would they want to trust a manufacturer, would they buy the same products we've been selling them and would they pay the same price or pay the same way? It is the marketplace that will force change, but the unseen hand will be customer-aligned business formats that stand between manufacturers and customers.

The theme of this entry ties in with several topics in the 'public policy' area of the website:
Regulations need to recognise that products as well as processes need controlling and that manufacturer liability (as in other consumer-threatening industries) is much more effective than distributor liability.
Competition policy needs to do more to encourage and reward genuinely independent distribution business models, with or without basic generic advice.
The idea that consumers also have a role to play in forcing change, but not by being more trusting, is a recurring theme in Personal responsibility.

Home
Archives

Topical Index:

Items are colour-coded:
For Kids Kids’ stuff
For Consumers For grown-up consumers
For Professionals Mainly for professionals
Showing Off Showing off

Monkey tricks
With-profits
Endowments
Precipice bonds
Commissions
Cost wedge

Investment sense and nonsense
Active v tracking
Accountants v actuaries
Low risk products
Asset allocation
Money illusion
Property myths
Equity returns
Pensions
Alternative investments

Making monkeys of ourselves
Personal responsibility
Streetwise finance
Kids' stuff

Public policy sense and nonsense
Regulations
Competition policy

<>March 2005
SMTWTFS
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Powered By Greymatter

External Links:

FSA consumer help
Investors Association forum
FT Your Money portal
The Motley Fool
ABI pension calculator
Pension glossary
Index of economics blogs
House Price Crash blog